Utilitarianism

John Stuart Mill

5 chapters · about 2 h

John Stuart Mill’s nineteenth-century essay examines utility as a foundation of morality. Its five chapters discuss happiness, moral obligation, proof and the relation between justice and utility; the supplied text is the seventh edition of 1879.

Get it in Sphinx

Coming soon to iPhone and Android. Join the waitlist to hear when Sphinx opens.

Join the waitlist
Your phone

We'll only email you about Sphinx; you can ask us to remove you any time.

The opening

CHAPTER I. GENERAL REMARKS.

GENERAL REMARKS.

There are few circumstances among those which make up the present condition of human knowledge, more unlike what might have been expected, or more significant of the backward state in which speculation on the most important subjects still lingers, than the little progress which has been made in the decision of the controversy respecting the criterion of right and wrong. From the dawn of philosophy, the question concerning the summum bonum, or, what is the same thing, concerning the foundation of morality, has been accounted the main problem in speculative thought, has occupied the most gifted intellects, and divided them into sects and schools, carrying on a vigorous warfare against one another. And after more than two thousand years the same discussions continue, philosophers are still ranged under the same contending banners, and neither thinkers nor mankind at large seem nearer to being unanimous on the subject, than when the youth Socrates listened to the old Protagoras, and asserted (if Plato’s dialogue be grounded on a real conversation) the theory of utilitarianism against the popular morality of the so-called sophist.

The whole book is in the Sphinx app.

About this edition

The words
The author's text, copied word for word.
Copied from

The printed seventh edition, London: Longmans, Green, and Co., 1879.

Left out
  • The source library's header, footer and license, in 5 places
  • The title page and opening pages before chapter 1
Kept as written

Its arguments about punishment, slavery, social equality and religious belief are kept as the author wrote them.

More like this